final week announced that they are to an Open Source giveaway permit and that they intend to entirely account it as a plan directly stating to their CEO . WebOS now becomes Whitman’s signature HP project.  This has some engaging implications.
CEO projects are surprising yet not unheard of; privately took over a series of projects over his reign in sequence to make certain they got adequate resources and oversight. The advantage to doing this is that it generally assures success since a associated success or disaster is tied right behind to a CEO; a downside is that they can turn a daze from other activities. This pierce is critical for WebOS since many anything else would have people doubt possibly this bid is vital to HP as against only being a approach to some-more elegantly exit a WebOS business yet holding a $1.2 billion write off during once. By doing it this approach Whitman is privately assuring a product that creates it vital by default.
WebOS uses a browser-based growth sourroundings that means that a aged summary of “write once run everywhere†that Java had indeed might request improved to WebOS. Granted this isn’t loyal of Firefox, that has had problems with WebOS apps, yet a other browsers should horde WebOS applications nicely. Given HP and are during fight and owns Java, it does yield another reason since HP might be resourcing this bid yet it also provides a clever value tender for WebOS that wouldn’t differently exist, and one a height that was suspicion passed will need.
I could write an whole mainstay on Android's shortcomings, from a fact it has turn a and to a really disproportionate peculiarity a height has historically enjoyed. Developers seem to have a love/hate attribute with , that has historically underfunded and under-marketed this Android effort. Despite all of this, it is a many renouned height since no one has been means to come adult with anything better. Well, WebOS is arguably improved and it comes with a curated App store, addressing a malware issue, and it was mutated for craving use during a tenure with HP, creation it inherently some-more secure and potentially some-more excusable to business. It will also be free, yet it will be wrapped with HP/Palm’s egghead property. HP’s IP portfolio rivals and ’s portfolios and HP is cross-licensed broadly, providing even deeper protection. In short, on paper, it is all Android is yet all of a problems. That is with one large exception: it doesn’t have a volume or App support it needs to truly be rival yet.
Clearly HP, that during a core is a hardware company, will be building hardware for this and there lies one of dual large problems. Historically, hardware vendors like Dell and Samsung have been demure to permit platforms from competitors like HP for fear they will possibly ravage a chartering bid (as IBM seemed to be formulation to do with OS/2) or kill it if it is too successful for competitors (as Apple did with their counterpart effort). This typically would make licensing, even for free, impossible. However given Google bought Motorola, formulating a same problem with Android, this is rather equivalent and, ironically, if WebOS does overcome this shortcoming, it will expected be this Google squeeze that will yield a many poignant reason.
Free products tend to turn cost centers and have problem nutritious funding. We’ve seen this several times with Google offerings and with Microsoft’s browser, quite during a IE 6 days. This will be strongly equivalent as a outcome of Meg Whitman’s approach oversight, by a income from HP’s App store, and their possess hardware efforts. But to assure success, HP will expected eventually have to find a approach to make this bid some-more of a distinction rather than a cost center. That is really formidable to do with a giveaway product, quite if we can’t follow Google’s lead and tie it as effectively to advertising. Google ability here is unmatched since they control so most of a promotion income on a Web.
With similarities to Java, OS/2, MacOS, PalmOS and Symbian efforts, yet differences from all of them, regardless of how this turns out a bid will be value watching. It will, for good or ill, turn a cornerstone of Meg Whitman’s HP and expected minister strongly her success or disaster there. That might be what assures this bid yet given a story that surrounds companies doing this, and Palm in general, this also represents a really high risk. In a end, a marketplace wants another clever platform, being reluctant to be entirely Apple formed or contingent on an mostly dreaming and unfocused Google. The timing is right; a execution will need to be exemplary. In short, this one bid could conclude Meg Whitman’s HP.
News referensi http://news.yahoo.com/hps-plan-webos-meg-whitmans-signature-effort-230102816.html
0 comments:
Post a Comment